Archived Opinion

Questions for the legislature

north carolinaBy Dave Waldrop • Guest Columnist

The North Carolina legislature has abandoned its responsibilities to public education under the guise of school choice. The state Supreme Court has ruled once that the legislature’s ill-conceived voucher program is unconstitutional. Unfortunately that ruling was reversed on appeal.

Regardless of how the courts rule, there remain questions as to the efficacy and propriety of the voucher program:

1. Has the Republican-led legislature turned its back on public education in spite of the fact that it is their job to nurture it both financially and, perhaps of even greater importance, with their hearts and souls?

2. Have legislators been influenced by lobbyists for private/religious schools? What role has groups like the Art Pope-sponsored PEFNC (Parents for Educational Freedom in North Carolina) played in the development of the bill?

3. Are standards equally applied to the evaluation of public and private/religious schools?

4. Has this legislature considered allowing a few public schools to operate with no state standards to see if they improve?

5. Who will be held liable if/when a student who has been provided a voucher to a private/religious school is abused or harmed in some way?

6. Are plans afoot to provide security officers in private/religious school to promote the safety and security of those students attending on vouchers?

7. Have background checks been conducted on teachers and staff of all private/religious schools to protect voucher enrollees from predators?

8. Who will be responsible for enforcing school attendance laws?

9. Will it become possible for tax money to be diverted from tax-funded community colleges and universities to privately operated schools?

One of the most quoted arguments in favor of the voucher program is that public schools need the competition from private, religious and for profit- schools. There may be some logic in that reasoning, but are the incentives of the market really transferable to the process of education? 

However, there has been precious little systematic comparison to convince reasonable legislators to dive headfirst into these murky waters. Competition is usually based on written rules and what is referred to as a “level playing field.” It is hard to compete when officials are able to make up the rules as they go along.

I give a lot of credence to the old adage, “Be careful. Don’t trade a good mule for a picture of a thoroughbred.” It may be fair to ask — who’s minding the education store in North Carolina?

(Dave Waldrop lives in Webster and can be reached at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it..)

Smokey Mountain News Logo
SUPPORT THE SMOKY MOUNTAIN NEWS AND
INDEPENDENT, AWARD-WINNING JOURNALISM
Go to top
Payment Information

/

At our inception 20 years ago, we chose to be different. Unlike other news organizations, we made the decision to provide in-depth, regional reporting free to anyone who wanted access to it. We don’t plan to change that model. Support from our readers will help us maintain and strengthen the editorial independence that is crucial to our mission to help make Western North Carolina a better place to call home. If you are able, please support The Smoky Mountain News.

The Smoky Mountain News is a wholly private corporation. Reader contributions support the journalistic mission of SMN to remain independent. Your support of SMN does not constitute a charitable donation. If you have a question about contributing to SMN, please contact us.